Skip to main content

Is Multipolar World Really a Global Democracy

The United States stood alone as the world’s sole superpower after the Soviet Union collapsed, where one dominant player wields the vast majority of military, economic, and cultural influence. We call this circumstance as unipolar world. That is essentially one setting the rules for everyone else.

Exploring the world map.

But if you look at the news lately, that single-power dynamic is slowly shifting, especially since the rise of China. We are moving towards a multipolar world - a setting where power and influence are distributed among a few major powers: the US, China, and Russia. Global stage now is like a game of throne. Their intense competition will be reshaping our world to multipolarity.

Given these realities, I have a big question that might spark some debate. Is a unipolar world actually a "global authoritarianism"? Is a multipolar world really a "global democracy"? I'm interested in looking at it through the lens of the availability of choice. Some people argue that a unipolar world is like a global authoritarianism. When the sole superpower rules, smaller or middle-power nations lack of free choice. They are constrained to follow that superpower's wishes or face crushing sanctions and isolation.

By that logic, a multipolar world sounds like a democracy. It creates choices. If smaller or middle-power nations don't like Washington's wishes, they can turn to Beijing or Moscow. The rivalry among the three major powers for influence and to draw others into their orbit indirectly creates leverage for smaller nations — like a bride being courted.

Is multipolarity truly democratic? The reality is complicated. In a true democracy, everyone is treated equally under the law and has an "equal say" (means that everyone has the same right of voice). In a multipolar world, smaller nations don't necessarily have equal say — they often become pawns or proxy battlegrounds in the superpower 3D chess games.

Furthermore, history shows that when three kingdoms compete for dominance, it is always the people who suffer. Hopefully, they can manage that rivalry responsibly.

The image of map by Lara Jameson from Pexels with free use license.

Comments

POPULAR POSTS LAST 7 DAYS:

LGBT and Human Rights

The existence of LGBT people in society is a fact. Legally, some countries legalize their status, while the majority of others still do not. What influences someone to become LGBT? There's a whole range of hypotheses, from the viewpoint of genetic, psychological, psychosocial, and personal experience. It is too long to write here, so please read it on the internet. The logical question is, who doesn't want to have a normal family (father, mother and biological children)? Sometimes I can understand that people who experience same-sex sexual desire are not their logical choice. LGBT people demand their rights using human rights arguments. Meanwhile, the majority use arguments that apply in society. Indeed, this is a complex phenomenon, like between liberals and conservatives. So, what is my view on this phenomenon? Well, I was born and raised in eastern culture, a religious society. But I tend to think moderately. Personal freedom of LGBT people in society to live and earn a livi...

Waiting In Line.

What? Talking about waiting in line? Yeah! Why not? Maybe you think this is a useless, trivial topic. But I witnessed several incidents of scrambling over the distribution of free basic food. Either the aid was from the government or from the UN. Even some people died as a result of being trampled under foot. It could be that the distribution method is not done correctly. But I think it's more about people's patience. In many cases, maybe you have heard stories about the method of bribing officers so that their wishes can be processed more quickly without having to queue. I have not found a study/research about which countries are the most disciplined in queuing. But from what I have heard and read so far, it is Japan. Changing the character of an adult (or an old person) is not easy. It's easier to educate children from birth. I'm talking about this topic not because I'm better than you. I'm just thinking about how to shape the character of our children as the ...

Chinese proverb about MONEY !

This is the proverb about money that I like the most. With MONEY we can buy a house, BUT NOT home-sweet-home. With MONEY we can buy a clock, BUT NOT time. With MONEY we can buy a bed, BUT NOT sleep-well. With MONEY we can buy books, BUT NOT knowledge. With MONEY we can buy good hospitalization, BUT NOT health. With MONEY we can buy a position, BUT NOT respect. With MONEY we can buy blood, BUT NOT life. With MONEY we can buy sex, BUT NOT love. I received this proverb by mail from my friend Steven. As a workaholic, I begin to wonder if money is something superior in this capitalist era, where many people are deifying money. This is in line to the saying: "money is the king". If you have read it word by word, then it is possible that this proverb has inspired you. Indeed, life needs money, but I think life more need the love of people around us especially family. Perhaps you also know many rich people whose life feel empty. Easy example of a couple who do not have children.