Skip to main content

Triple Filter Test

In ancient Greece, Socrates was known to have great knowledge and was very honorable. One day, a woman met him and said, "Do you know what I just heard about your best friend?"
"Wait a moment," Socrates answered; "Before you tell me anything, I will give you a simple test called the Triple Filter Test."

The first filter is TRUTHFULNESS:
"Are you sure that what you are going to tell me is true?".
"No, actually, I JUST HEARD ISSUES about it," the woman replied.
"Good," said Socrates. "So you're not sure it's true? Ok, now I'll give you the second filter."

The second filter is GOODNESS:
"Is what you are going to say about my friend something good?"
"No, quite the opposite..." answered the woman.
So, Socrates continues, "you will tell something bad about him, but you are not sure whether it is true. Well, you still have one more chance; there is still one more filter, namely the third filter."

The third filter is USEFULNESS:
"Is what you are going to tell me about my friend useful to me?"
"No, absolutely not," said the woman.

So, Socrates concluded: "If you want to tell me something that is NOT NECESSARILY TRUE, NOT ABOUT GOODNESS, and even USELESS, why should you tell it to me?"

Let's use the "Triple Filter Test" every time you hear something about your best friend or someone else. If that is not about truth, kindness, or positive usefulness, then you don't need to accept it. And if you accidentally or have already heard it, then don't share it with other people, and don't hurt other people's feelings.

Pssst... I read this snippet a long time ago in a WhatsApp group. I don't know who the author of this philosophical conversation is or whether it actually happened to Socrates. I just think it would be a good idea to share it on this blog. Are you also tempted to find out about someone's bad things?

The philosophy to filtering out the bad stuff.

Photo by Michael Burrows from Pexels: https://www.pexels.com/photo/unrecognizable-person-brewing-aromatic-pour-over-coffee-in-garden-7125644/

Comments

  1. Anonymous14/1/24

    This makes a huge load of sense . . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous14/1/24

    Its good learning to have an effective communication👍

    ReplyDelete
  3. great steps to filter anything news come to us.....
    thank you for sharing

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post.
    By the way, the conversation uses woman as object as if woman like to makes gossip.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm... it's just the translation from the source. You can replace it to Mr. X

      Delete
  5. Baik juga ya 3 test filter ini diterapkan, Mas.
    Sering ketika mendengar kabar, langsung saja menelannya. Menerima apa yang disampaikan dengan terbuka.

    Salam,

    ReplyDelete
  6. I remember years ago taking a pretty basic logic course and learing how an argument can be "valid" but not "true." Whether any statement is "useful" would be open to debate, I would think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, being logically valid is not necessarily the truth. Likewise, an issue that is useful for one person may not be useful for others. It depends on the context and circumstances.
      Usually, the issue about someone's bad things may be useful in the context of politics, like in the presidential election debate.

      Delete
    2. Nicely put. Perhaps sometimes we have to speak out, while other times it's not helpful.

      Delete
  7. Menyampaikan informasi yang belum tentu kebenarannya, sudah merupakan penyakit menahun bagi segolongan orang. Celakanya, pendengarnya juga siap untuk mendengar. Makin didengar makin, hangat ceritanya. He he

    ReplyDelete
  8. what a great post. It really opens up my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Satu Syawal menjelang tiba,
    Saudara Palestin jangan dilupa,
    Sekiranya ada silap dan dosa,
    Ampun dipinta di hari mulia.

    ReplyDelete
  10. apalagi sekarang eranya video short atau reel
    banyak masyarakat yang terkecoh, antara sekedar konten dan peristiwa sesungguhnya

    ReplyDelete
  11. triple test is absolutely amazing. but sometimes we forget to do that, we are often follow the flow.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: comment moderation is activated due to a lot of spam comments. Comments containing racial hatred, personal attacks, or advertising are strictly prohibited.

POPULAR POSTS LAST 7 DAYS:

WHY

I do not know who create this song. I do not understand its lyric. I just know that this song really touched my heart. I listened to it over and over. Eventually I tried to find out the meaning of the first 3 characters of the lyrics, and found its meaning: 为什么 = WHY. My friend told me that the question was answered in the lyrics: 因为我 = BECAUSE OF ME. Let me go through this post begging you fellow Christian brother please return to the beginning of Christianity, let's back to the Bible. My religious consciousness told me that Jesus did NOT teach you to create many denominations of Christianity. If Christianity begun from one person, that is Jesus, then why I see many denominations to this day. Let this world only know one Christianity, one faith, one communion, one congregation. I am begging you, please! Post update 24 March 2021: The greatness of God (infinite) is beyond human knowledge (finite). Please remember the story about St. Augustine and a child by seaside whose want to po...

Tacit knowledge

Frankly, this is the most difficult topic for me to write about. This is something abstract, not easy to express or formulate in written or verbal form. But I tried to express it in this post. When I was in junior high school, I was told that knowledge consisted of two main branches, namely exact and non-exact knowledge, as I mentioned in a previous post . Simply, I refer to it as logical and illogical knowledge, the two inseparable abilities which actually united and embedded within humans as I mentioned in the other previous post . I think those two posts can stimulate our minds on how to understand Tacit knowledge. There are two main realms. The first realm refers to the science of mathematics, physics, chemistry, computer programming, etc., which can be coded/formulated, where the result is logically certain. The second realm refers to social sciences, politics, psychology, philosophy, art, etc., which cannot be coded/formulated with a definite formula. Lately I have heard the term...