Skip to main content

What a PhD mean for you

What is Ph.D.? Yes I know it is a prestigious academic degree. Only that? Hmm... I think NO. It's hard to describe it in words. You better focus on the illustration below:

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.01)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.02)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.03)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.04)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.05)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.06)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.07)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.08)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.09)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.10)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.11)

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.12)

And... the things that made me fall silent is what was said by Matt, below:
"If you zoom in on the boundary of human knowledge in the direction of genetics, there's something just outside humanity's reach. My wife and I chose to start funding these graduate students after we learned that our son has a rare, fatal genetic disorder. It may be too late for my son, but it's not too late for other children. Even one child suffering is one child too many. The only way to end this kind of suffering is science. And, the best way to do science is through graduate students."

The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D (Fig.13)

What a beautiful thought that touched my heart.
Note: This work was originally from The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D. by Matt Might.

Comments

  1. I do hope the best for your son.

    There are some interesting statistics to add to your diagram. For example, one study shows that college seniors know less about many subjects than college freshmen! The link is here:

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/111290/college_seniors_lack_basic_knowledge.html

    My variation on the above is based on my R&D experience: Only about 1 in 10 Ph.d.'s will ever reach the boundary of human knowledge, and even fewer will actually make a dent. A few of those who do make a dent will, for one reason or another, have their work dismissed or lost. The good news is that there are millions of ph.d.'s so a large number will succeed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a great way of explaining it. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. And then there are the multitude of the rest of society who, through their own determination and hard work end up contributing far more to humanity than the total number of PhDs, yet go unrecognized, unable to attach a few letters to their name, and who in their humility, do not care for such recognition.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A (very) moving and positive story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was amazed by the circle representation of human knowledge described above. I've just realised how little a Ph.D's knowledge is compared to the knowledge-base built by humanity along the timeline. It's only a dot to the full circle, it is even not big enough to form the least visible of arc.

    But one thing I believe, it doesn't matter whether you are a Ph.D or not but as a wise human being we have to ever expand our knowledge the best we can, even though it will take forever to master a single dot of knowledge in the ever expanding huge circle of human knowledge.... Good post. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great illustration... But I feel sorry for the sick boy. I hope as more and more becomes knowledge seekers. This would help cure lots of ailments in the future generation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @ Looney,
    My son was fine and he's growing like a normal kid :)
    Thank for share the link. This tendency is similar to the math lesson that is felt as a scourge for most students in Indonesia.

    "A few of those who do make a dent will, for one reason or another, have their work dismissed or lost."
    What do you mean human cloning?

    @ Cheerful Monk (Jean),
    Interesting to know from what you think and ponder after observed the illustration above :)

    @ Colson,
    After that... what you think? What is its positive sides? A satire to Ph.D.? (like a critical story from the link given by Looney).

    @ Yari,
    My musings is the human child at best they can do is thicken the dot and make a teeny dent on the edge of the knowledge circle. The more the number of dent are made at each edge of the circle then it will slightly enlarge the circle as wide as a teeny dent.

    @ Jolly Princess,
    Really hope it will happen ;)

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ David,
    Your comment makes sense, but ... what kind of person are you referring to?

    ReplyDelete
  9. PhD explanation is fantastic Tikno, thank you. Matt's comments are also very touching and very humane. Great post. My compliments to you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @ Rummuser,
    Your compliments should be given to Matt.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hello:)

    Amazing illustration and amazing thought.

    In Tamil language there is a saying-WHAT WE KNOW IS ONLY A HANDFUL AND WHAT WE DON'T KNOW IS AS MUCH AS THE UNIVERSE.

    The fact is that while we think we have reached the boundary, the boundary keeps on extending further and further and the human brain can never really reach the boundary.Some solutions for problems can be found but not all because we have some problem or the other cropping up all the time and all through the ages.When we think we have solved one problem another problem crops up.

    One PHD or even ten PHD's will not solve the problems or sickness's of this world.

    Faith in God and devoted care by parents has helped many seriously sick children to get over their sickness.There are innumerable examples.

    Best wishes:)
    Joseph

    ReplyDelete
  12. @ Joseph Pulikotil,
    Would you like to explain the examples you mean?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hello:)

    Please go to google and type

    http://www.disabled-world.com/artman/publish/article_0060.shtml

    You will get innumerable people who became famous despite their serious illnesses.

    Best wishes:)
    Joseph

    ReplyDelete
  14. @ Joseph Pulikotil,
    Thank for share the link. Maybe you are right that the boundary keeps on extending further and further and the human brain can never really reach the boundary. Like the human effort to explore the outer space, right?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi there! This is a very interesting illustration. Thanks for sharing. I believe that knowledge is ever expanding, and learning is continuous. Sadly, some people though, believe that they are better than others because of the educational background they reached. Anyway, nice reading your entries again Tikno:-)

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Pearl,
    Been loooong time not heard you. Hope to see you come back again.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous5/11/10

    It's commendable that learned, intelligent people would contribute their work and skills to do humanitarian work, save people's lives and greatly help people alleviate suffering. But it does not take a PHD to do that. Even ordinary people with little education or no education at all can help, in his own way, to make this world a better place----help restore the sick, feed the hungry, give shelter to the poor, encourage the downtrodden, etc. In God's eyes and in people's eyes, a little deed is a great deed. It doesn't need a PhD

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bingkee,
    You catch a good points.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hi Tikno,
    I really love this article. thanks for sharing

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks a lot for this article, can I use it in report and refer to the source?

    Many thanks again

    ReplyDelete
  21. not true for current application science

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting. Can you explain it further?

      Delete

Post a Comment

NOTE: comment moderation is activated due to a lot of spam comments. Comments containing racial hatred, personal attacks, or advertising are strictly prohibited.

POPULAR POSTS LAST 7 DAYS:

Triple Filter Test

In ancient Greece, Socrates was known to have great knowledge and was very honorable. One day, a woman met him and said, "Do you know what I just heard about your best friend?" "Wait a moment," Socrates answered; "Before you tell me anything, I will give you a simple test called the Triple Filter Test." The first filter is TRUTHFULNESS: "Are you sure that what you are going to tell me is true?". "No, actually, I JUST HEARD ISSUES about it," the woman replied. "Good," said Socrates. "So you're not sure it's true? Ok, now I'll give you the second filter." The second filter is GOODNESS: "Is what you are going to say about my friend something good?" "No, quite the opposite..." answered the woman. So, Socrates continues, "you will tell something bad about him, but you are not sure whether it is true. Well, you still have one more chance; there is still one more filter, namely the third...

Tacit knowledge

Frankly, this is the most difficult topic for me to write about. This is something abstract, not easy to express or formulate in written or verbal form. But I tried to express it in this post. When I was in junior high school, I was told that knowledge consisted of two main branches, namely exact and non-exact knowledge, as I mentioned in a previous post . Simply, I refer to it as logical and illogical knowledge, the two inseparable abilities which actually united and embedded within humans as I mentioned in the other previous post . I think those two posts can stimulate our minds on how to understand Tacit knowledge. There are two main realms. The first realm refers to the science of mathematics, physics, chemistry, computer programming, etc., which can be coded/formulated, where the result is logically certain. The second realm refers to social sciences, politics, psychology, philosophy, art, etc., which cannot be coded/formulated with a definite formula. Lately I have heard the term...

LGBT and Human Rights

The existence of LGBT people in society is a fact. Legally, some countries legalize their status, while the majority of others still do not. What influences someone to become LGBT? There's a whole range of hypotheses, from the viewpoint of genetic, psychological, psychosocial, and personal experience. It is too long to write here, so please read it on the internet. The logical question is, who doesn't want to have a normal family (father, mother and biological children)? Sometimes I can understand that people who experience same-sex sexual desire are not their logical choice. LGBT people demand their rights using human rights arguments. Meanwhile, the majority use arguments that apply in society. Indeed, this is a complex phenomenon, like between liberals and conservatives. So, what is my view on this phenomenon? Well, I was born and raised in eastern culture, a religious society. But I tend to think moderately. Personal freedom of LGBT people in society to live and earn a livi...