Skip to main content

What was in my mind regarding same-sex marriage

The escalation of same-sex marriage sometimes intrigues me to think about this phenomenon. Often I think of the analogy of a cell that mutates to become resistant against antibiotics, so I'm imagining whether human genes are also mutating to become resistant against the complexity of love, in order to find an alternative way. Along with the development of this phenomenon, scientists, who I think stand in a neutral position, need to do "laboratory research" to find a new formula like this:

Chromosome X + X = resulting a baby.
Chromosome Y + Y = resulting a baby.

Usually, supporters of same-sex marriage always use the keyword "human rights" to get their rights. Hmm... humans create "human rights", and then these "rights" are being used to get another "unusual right".

In this opportunity, let me share my statistical forecast, which was in my imagination, namely:

  1. If the trend of gay marriage goes up, then the trend of plastic surgery by women will go down.
  2. If the trend of lesbian marriage goes up, then the trend of macho men will go down.
  3. If we tend to let both of the statistics go up, then the trend of human populations will go down.

Could this be interpreted as no baby any longer? Aha... this is more dangerous than the issue of climate change, but... wait a minute, or otherwise it will help to reduce global warming. Which one do you choose? If you say more dangerous, then the international concern needs to be raised because this is a warning about the future of human history. If not, then the scientists need to test the formula above as soon as possible.

Psst... I'm just releasing my mind within this post while still letting you disagree with me. Just say this is my mad post.

Comments

  1. very smart analysis! =)
    sorry, i'm not an expert in chromosome =)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Okay, maybe it is a mad post, but it is a funny one. And I for one love it.

    The good news of course is that the remaining heterosexuals will probably meet the challenge by going as wild as rabbits. I have no doubt the human species will manage to hit 10 billion inhabitants worldwide halfway this century.

    Anyhow, I think same sex marriage is okay. Just like marriage between heterosexual couples, it is not about human rights in the first place, but about love.

    Btw: actually some recent scientific information warned about the ongoing deteriotation of the "Y" chromosome. In due time it will probably disappear alltogether and from then on procreation will be the exclusisive activity of woman.

    And an other established fact: irrespective of other ethnic differences, about 7% of the population is homosexual by birth. So, lesbians and gays will not beat that number now or in the foreseeable future.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yenni, thank you for your comment.

    Colson, I agree with you that love takes the first place. Just a post for joke and refresh.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tikno, just imagine, when men stop chasing women there is less heat produced and so global warming comes down!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rummuser, but... if men really stop chasing women, then the trend of IVF (In Vitro fertilization) will increases, lol.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello Tikno how are you I hope your doing well. I believe in live and let live, I don't know why god made man and woman if it was supposed to be same sex relationships, how ever it is only God who knows for sure. I don't condemn anyone they can live as they feel. Each person has a right to live as they do on this planet. I believe in live and let live and be the best I can daily... Have a wonderful day... you may visit ant time you wish...

    ReplyDelete
  7. JK, I'm fine and thank you so much for coming. Yes, only God knows.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If the trend of lesbian marriage is go up and If the trend of gay marriage is go up, it means the end of the word.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting analogy, though..
    Still there are resisting factor towards this same-sex marriage thing and perhaps an almost equal balance as the world we live in is getting crazier that it was before.. let's pray that not all of us turn our back on sustaining our existence..

    ReplyDelete
  10. i don't find the post "mad" as you term it...in fact i love the awareness it provides.

    actually i disagree with gay marriages...for one simple reason:

    GOD CREATED MAN AND WOMAN ALONE and nothing in between.

    life round meNyou
    heartQUAKES
    HEALTHINFO@EarthyMe
    at-a-blink

    THANKS FOR VISITNG MY BLOG, HOPE YOU SEE MY OTHERS.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Seno, Ksatrio, and Jenie, thank you for your comment.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think people are making a big deal out of nothing. So a few gay people want to marry and be with each other; who really cares? It's certainly not like heterosexual marriages have been all that perfect; the divorce rate in America is more than 50%. And here, we have a ratio of more women than men, and in the black community the ratio is 7 black men to every 10 black women.

    Of course, the other side of that is that, as couples, then invariably all want to have children. Truthfully, since there are so many children waiting to be adopted, I don't have many problems there either. Children can't be taught to be gay, so they'll choose whomever they're eventually attracted to. Natural selection is a powerful thing.

    Heck, a Blogspot blog; means I won't see your response. Oh well...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Mitch, if gay marriage continues to grow then the imbalance ratio will more slant. How the destiny of the remaining ladies ?

    btw, you may click "subscribe by email" at the bottom of comment-box to see my response as well as other comments.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I share the same concern about this. Some country have legalised a same sex marriage, which is opening an alternative for human to choose their couple. Just imagine halft of human turn into gay and lesbian and it already feels more than scary. :P

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ferry Prima, I better not imagine the scary things.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The same-sex marriage in social term is an anomaly, but it is naturally present in science because now scientists believe that homosexuality to some extent is controlled by genetic factors... I don't want to analyse it from the religious points of view because I'm not an expert at it...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yari NK,
    Same with me using statistical imagination and science fiction in this post.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous19/9/10

    tikno, I like this post. I think gay people should be able to live together in privacy, but this should not be called marriage. Marriage should be kept special, just for male plus female. It is for having children and teaching them morals.

    ReplyDelete
  20. CONSVTLTVS;
    Actually gay and lesbian couples can adopt children in the U.S. and they often make wonderful parents. I personally know one such couple and the two children are very responsible and will no doubt make good citizens.

    Sorry, Rummuser, but from what I hear a homosexual male or female chasing someone of the same sex generates as much heat as a man chasing a woman. It was a nice idea though. :)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous23/9/10

    Cheerful Monk

    Yes, some would be loving parents, but you have to compare good gay couples with good straight couples (apples and apples). Children need both sexes to model. Also, there's no time in history when anyone has ever tried this. In the U.S., some judges are trying to force us to change our society against the wishes of the majority. If you want to read more of what I think, you can check out my logic here: http://consvltvs.blogspot.com/2010/08/last-straw-first-post-part-i.html

    If you disagree, write a comment!

    ReplyDelete
  22. we changed our views and culture .... same sex intercourse had happened....

    good post

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: comment moderation is activated due to a lot of spam comments. Comments containing racial hatred, personal attacks, or advertising are strictly prohibited.

POPULAR POSTS LAST 7 DAYS:

WHY

I do not know who create this song. I do not understand its lyric. I just know that this song really touched my heart. I listened to it over and over. Eventually I tried to find out the meaning of the first 3 characters of the lyrics, and found its meaning: 为什么 = WHY. My friend told me that the question was answered in the lyrics: 因为我 = BECAUSE OF ME. Let me go through this post begging you fellow Christian brother please return to the beginning of Christianity, let's back to the Bible. My religious consciousness told me that Jesus did NOT teach you to create many denominations of Christianity. If Christianity begun from one person, that is Jesus, then why I see many denominations to this day. Let this world only know one Christianity, one faith, one communion, one congregation. I am begging you, please! Post update 24 March 2021: The greatness of God (infinite) is beyond human knowledge (finite). Please remember the story about St. Augustine and a child by seaside whose want to po...

Tacit knowledge

Frankly, this is the most difficult topic for me to write about. This is something abstract, not easy to express or formulate in written or verbal form. But I tried to express it in this post. When I was in junior high school, I was told that knowledge consisted of two main branches, namely exact and non-exact knowledge, as I mentioned in a previous post . Simply, I refer to it as logical and illogical knowledge, the two inseparable abilities which actually united and embedded within humans as I mentioned in the other previous post . I think those two posts can stimulate our minds on how to understand Tacit knowledge. There are two main realms. The first realm refers to the science of mathematics, physics, chemistry, computer programming, etc., which can be coded/formulated, where the result is logically certain. The second realm refers to social sciences, politics, psychology, philosophy, art, etc., which cannot be coded/formulated with a definite formula. Lately I have heard the term...

Triple Filter Test

In ancient Greece, Socrates was known to have great knowledge and was very honorable. One day, a woman met him and said, "Do you know what I just heard about your best friend?" "Wait a moment," Socrates answered; "Before you tell me anything, I will give you a simple test called the Triple Filter Test." The first filter is TRUTHFULNESS: "Are you sure that what you are going to tell me is true?". "No, actually, I JUST HEARD ISSUES about it," the woman replied. "Good," said Socrates. "So you're not sure it's true? Ok, now I'll give you the second filter." The second filter is GOODNESS: "Is what you are going to say about my friend something good?" "No, quite the opposite..." answered the woman. So, Socrates continues, "you will tell something bad about him, but you are not sure whether it is true. Well, you still have one more chance; there is still one more filter, namely the third...