Skip to main content

Sincerity mathematical formula.

I classify science into two: exact and non-exact science. I am sure you have known mathematical formulas to calculate area, volume, profit and loss in business, etc. This field is known as exact science which requires logical thinking. Beyond exact science such as philosophy, theology, social, politic, in my opinion there is no exact formula. Am I correct?

Well, what if we make a mathematical formula to calculate the level of sincerity. Can it be? Let's try it. For this one I made the following illustration.

Mathematical formula to calculate sincerity.

I am aware that the hypothesis above has not yet been scientifically tested, therefore I allow the researchers to test it. For readers of this blog, please understand and prove it yourself from your own viewpoint. Perhaps you are imagining the formula above is a form of bill to calculate the expected result of your good deeds to God. Ohh... that is up to you because I am not forcing you to do that.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Ross24/12/18

    What if 0/0 = 0 give "nothing" and expect "nothing"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tikno24/12/18

      then you will get "status quo" LOL

      Delete
  2. Rummuser25/12/18

    Brilliant. I am sharing on facebook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tikno26/12/18

      Thanks. Hopefully they like it.

      Delete
  3. CheerfulMonk27/12/18

    I like it! I believe in appreciating what I have and giving without expecting anything in return, and it works for me! LOL!

    I like your statement saying people are prohibited from making personal attacks. Not everyone does that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tikno27/12/18

      Nice to hear your positive experience about sincerity. That's something rare nowadays. That's as rare as finding true love in the material age, where "desire" is often found to exceed "affordability".

      Delete
  4. Tanza Erlambang - Sawan Fibriosis7/9/23

    👍👍

    ReplyDelete
  5. Abam Kie8/9/23

    I took pure science when I was at SBP. But later I did TESL and became a teacher...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Earthpages.org10/9/23

    Clever and amusing. But I'm not sure everyone would agree on your primary distinction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tikno10/9/23

      Will you explain it further what is my primary distinction?

      Delete

Post a Comment

NOTE: comment moderation is activated due to a lot of spam comments. Comments containing racial hatred, personal attacks, or advertising are strictly prohibited.

POPULAR POSTS LAST 7 DAYS:

VETO VS DEMOCRACY

In this post I only quotes the things associated with the two words above. Please use your sense and read carefully to find and feel the fundamental differences from it. VETO According to Wikipedia : A veto, Latin for I FORBID , is used to denote that a certain party has the right to stop unilaterally a certain piece of legislation. In practice, the veto can be ABSOLUTE (as in the U.N. Security Council, whose permanent members can block any resolution). In the United Nations Security Council, the five permanent members (the United States, Russia, the People's Republic of China, France and the United Kingdom) have veto power in substantive matters, though NOT in procedural ones. If any of these countries votes against a proposal, it is REJECTED , even if all of the other member countries vote in favor. According to Global Policy Forum : "The five permanent members of the Security Council (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States) ENJOY the privilege of veto po...
84 comments
Read more

Aware or just a dream

Dear readers, if you are a regular visitor of this blog, perhaps you still remember my post titled " If One Why Different " (posted on 1 September 2008). In that post, I wrote about how I heard badly debate of religions among my friends when we gathered together, that is, each person seeks to maintain his own opinion namely his religion is the most relevant in this century. Within that post you may also read my thoughts as the response to them, as well as readers comment, and I would like to rewrite my thoughts as below: Humans have existed far before any religions emerge on this earth. The universe has existed far before the humans and religions. And... God, only one God, has existed far before the universe, humans, and any religions. Who is the owner of my soul, your soul and the soul of all creatures in this world? Only one or many? If only one, then why must we be different. Please readers do not feel confused with the question "why we must different" because ...
43 comments
Read more

Islamic law - whether it is about a choice

Before you continues to read this post, please read the brief history of Aceh , until Tsunami disaster happened and finally get a special autonomy right from Indonesian central government. For years the Indonesian military has struggle to fight against what we call Gerakan Aceh Merdeka / GAM (English: Free Aceh Movement) who want to establish an Islamic state and impose Sharia law in Aceh province. This proves that Indonesia do not wanting Islamic state system because Indonesia is a country based on the laws (national law), democratic, consist of various ethnic groups, has 6 official religion, with national motto: Unity in diversity, not an Islamic state that implement Sharia law. However, this war has caused many casualties and was not offering the civil order, harmony, and security for millions of civilians in Aceh. I say thousands of victims as a side effect of war, not just a matter of the position of a woman as reported by Jakarta Globe with the title " Women Unfit to Lead,...
34 comments
Read more