Skip to main content

Why Vote for Nuances Religious Party Go Down

In Legislative Election 2009 in Indonesia, happened the trend of decreasing vote for party with religious nuance, both the nuances of Islam or Christian. This phenomena was attract me in making this post.

I see party in Indonesia can be divided into two parts that is, nuances religious and nuances moderate / nationalist. In the history of national scale election in Indonesia, party nuances Christian has not been able to show significant vote. This could be happened, perhaps because the percentage of Christians population is very small. Which is the interesting matter is, there was decreasing trend of vote for party nuances of Islam in Indonesia (the world's most populous Moslem), except PKS party. The success of PKS party to maintain their vote is because they have an effort to divert the issue of religious sentiment into general issue.

According to a researcher from The Indonesian Survey Institute (Lembaga Survei Indonesia / LSI), Burhanuddin Muhtadi (Jawa Pos newspaper, Saturday, April 11th 2009), analyze that the defeat is because among Islamic political party snatch the same base voters, so the vote obtained is decrease. "I call this cannibalism among Islamic political party. Mutually eat each other" said Burhanuddin. Still according to Burhanuddin, Islamic political party can not yet reach the market of voters with nationalist background, who generally to be object by majority of the party. "That because of selling the wrong issue. They are still selling religious issues, such as pornography, Jakarta Charter (Piagam Jakarta), or Syariat Islam. Whereas voters society no longer consider to the religious dimension, but more to the real problems", said him. It seems "rift of market" from the voter for Islamic political party has seized by moderate parties.

From all of that, my mind come to some conclusion below:
  1. In political matter, modern society more thinking (interested) to the real issue such as education, health, housing, economy, social guarantee, employment availability, corruption or clean government, tax policy, national stability, environment, etc.
  2. The higher the average education level of society, then they will be more critical in determining their choice. They no longer choosing based on "individual charm" but more seeing the vision, mission, and policy from a party. Maybe more interested to what has they done.
Are you have another conclusion? or seeing the differ cases with the same topic on other country? or maybe in your own country? Feel free to add it in comment.
If you interested to view the number of obtained vote for each participant party on Indonesia Legislative Election 2009, please click here.

Pssst... there is some proverb in political world, that is: There is no eternal opponent or fellow, there is only eternal interests. -or- Politic is who gets what. Believes it or not.

Comments

  1. waaah aku ngga ngerti tuh artinya...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haven't seen the strength of the religious parties. They just fight for their own religion, but they never pay attention to other religions. Party is for national interest, not just for one religion only. Our nation has grown up and think for their nation, more rather than just caring about their own group.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What i think, even moderat party they still need ideological approach to gain the sympathy of their masses, maintaining low profile and keep steady step on the base of the party vision and objective. otherwise they will get loss in the next election..

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Vicky Laurentina - I agree with you: "Party is for national interest"

    @Rampadan - why confused?

    @Mama Hilda - Yes, ideology approach with nuances nationalist / moderate (not religious approach) that can embrace all groups. This was evidenced by the party of Demokrat, Golkar, and PDIP. See the result of their obtained vote. They are listing in big three. In POLITICAL matter, modern society more thinking (interested) to the real issue.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Congratulations to all Indonesia for the great election that you have had and the equally great result. Your post is very incisive and to the point.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Obviously there are lots of important things beyond religion issues, just like you've mentioned above. Thank goodness people finally see that as priorities nowadays.

    ReplyDelete
  7. From quite a distance it looks like the Indonesian voters have rendered the Indonesian democracy a huge service: they voted for common sense and moderation.

    And, since you asked for it ( "Are you have another conclusion? or seeing the differ cases with the same topic on other country? or maybe in your own country?"), there is this interesting case of Christian Democratic parties in Europe.

    They had their finest hours when they were struggling to "emancipate" their Roman Catholic and Protestant minorities in the predominantly conservative/liberal societies in the nineteenth century. That doesn't apply to the Islamic parties in modern Indonesia; no need for emancipation of Muslims in a country where 9 out of 10 person is a Muslim.

    But these Christian Democrats are still strong in countries like Austria, The Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. They actually represent roughly 25 - 35 % of the voters in our secular societies. This lasting success is not because their voters choose "religious" candidates, but quite the opposite. They are successful because they did cut their ties with officials of the religious denominations. They are even welcoming members and voters of other religions, Muslims included. Atheists even. The majority of their present electorate consists of people who prefer their slightly left leaning socia-economic stand, combined with their moderately conservative moral issues.

    Maybe that can be a challenge for a party like PKS also; no specific radical issues in relation to Islam, but mildly left leaning centrist policies in socio-economic and moderately conservative on moral issues.

    As I said, these parties have no direct ties anymore with any organized part of either the Catholic or Protestant Church. Recently Angela Merkel ( the Christina Democratic German Chancelor = Prime Minister)for instance gave proof of this the other day by openly and strongly rebuking the Pope (Benedictus, who is a German by the way)who said quite stupid things about the use of condoms in the struggle against HIV/Aids in Africa.

    ReplyDelete
  8. to my perspective, Religious name used by political party in indonesia is only a label. to prove that the party is religious or not is by seeing their actions in the field. there may be so many political parties with religious name but very small number that really base all their movement to the religious name they use. Societiy today wants more proof in the field rather than slogan and empty words...

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Rummuser - Thank you. I heard your country, India, also holding general elections, same with Indonesia which starting on April 2009. How do people react towards the party with nuances religious in India. It's interesting to hear your reply.

    @Devi - I also thanks to the God for this great result (like Rummuser said).

    @Colson - Thank you very much for sharing an interesting case. From your comments above I captured its points as follows:

    1) No direct ties anymore with any religious denominations.
    Seem they have been putting a clear distinction between the matter of religious and country, and I tend to think like this.
    How with you?

    2) Moderately conservative moral issues which comfortable to all group, and NOT specific radical issues.
    I do not know whether that referred to "ideological approach" by Mama Hilda is like this.

    @Azarre - Only a label or not... people will knows.
    But I agree with you: "Society today wants more proof in the field rather than slogan and empty words"

    ReplyDelete
  10. Menurut saya, rendahnya keterpilihan partai berbasis agama karena mereka tidak memiliki diferensiasi. Publik tdk bisa membedakannya dengan partai lainnya selai issu agama yg mereka bawa. Sementara issu agama itu sendiri tidak menarik bagi publik yang sebagian besar cenderung sekuler.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, you right. As an innovative company that make diversification to their products. If it does not make any changes, it will continue to fall behind.

    ReplyDelete
  12. maaf saya telat mas Tikno, membaca postingan menarik ini. Betul bahwa PKSlah yang paling berhasil namun hanya dibawah 10 persen saja itu karena strategi PKS yang menganut poligami dan anak banyak hahaha, mungkin 20 tahun lagi mereka menang.

    Tapi memang juga pesona Gerindra dan hanura cukup fenomenal juga dengan mengusung isu ekonomi dan pendidikan, cilakanya memang mereka tidak memiliki mesin politik yang tangguh, sementara mesin politik golkar juga sudah banyak tersedot ke Demokrat yang rajin mengumpulkan suara sedikit demi sedikit seperti PKS juga.

    Namun jika dihitung perolehan total suara partai berbasis agama dan nasionalis bisa berimbang juga loh, maklum karena multi partai sehingga sekatnya banyak... waduh komentarnya kebanyakan... hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  13. Apapun yang terjadi Indonesia harus tetap utuh

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Suryaden - Can be said nearly balanced, but unfortunately part of their voters was move to the nationalist based parties.

    @Ibnu - My hope also like you.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think the most important is not in the type of party. The most important is how they build Indonesia, give the best for the nation, no corruption, fair and not standing in party and it's group.

    Yes, I'm going with you in the last paragraph, In politic There is no eternal opponent or fellow he.eh..

    ReplyDelete
  16. Apapun Partainya, Minumnya Teh ..

    Eh salah, .....My Loyalty to my party ends, when my loyalty to my Country Begins ....

    Nggak ada ya Politisi yang Kayak Gitu ...

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Seno - Feels, you also think like moderate.

    @Mas Dan - You have point of view which it very good.

    ReplyDelete
  18. A new Indonesian Movie 2009
    "campaign as market"
    "parties are merchants"
    "national as internet"
    "Islam as microsoft software" (holy pirated)
    "voter as potential buyer"
    "Media as Google adwords"
    and I am just merely beggar at market, dont know what the heck movie is this, because I never like indonesian idiot movie.. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  19. Partai dengan platform "religi" hampir semua mengalami penurunan suara dalam pemilu legislatif karena :
    Masyarakat perlu pembuktian keseharian dalam bersikap tidak hanya pada saat kampanye saja (kondisi keamanan dan kenyamanan dalam bernegara)
    Belum adanya isue yang diangkat yang membumi dan general artinya tidak khusus untuk agama tertentu

    Salam

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Bhart - You are very poetical.

    @Jenny Oetomo - What's wrong with their daily attitude.

    @Pandu - welcome to you.

    ReplyDelete
  21. pada awalnya domain politik adalah sekular, ini pendapat Saya Pak. Jika kemudian ada nuansa religiusnya, mungkin lebih pada spirit dan moralitasnya (kalau masih ada....). Kalaupun kemudian muncl partai2 berbasis agama tertentu; pasti akan bertabrakan dengan arus utama demokrasi; contoh kemenangan Front Islamic Salvation di ALjazair dianulir atas campurtangan pihak luar; Indonesia akan bergerak ke arah domain politik di mana basis religius setingkat lebih bawah di bawah garis demokrasi sekular; dan ini bisa konfrontatif di kemudian hari, jika pihak ketiga selalu meng-kompori. Peroleh suara yang mengecil akibat mekanisme poltik yang berubah menjadi komoditas; something like Machiavlism.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Muanwar,
    Did you mean the number of vote also depend on money politic?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

COMMENT POLICY : Spam comments will be deleted without notice.

Popular posts from this blog

Mr. Money is not guilty

This is a special guest post. The grievances and notice from Mr. Money that share it in sorrow to readers. Please read carefully below :

My name is Mr. Money (sometime was called : Dough). My face is just plain, my physical is also weak, but I am able to overhaul the world order.

I'm able to change the behavior even human nature because humans idolize me. Many people change their personality, betray friends, sell their bodies, even abandon their faith, for my sake. That's not my command, note that!

I really do not understand the difference of pious and depraved people, but humans using me as a benchmark, determine rich or poor, honorable or lowly. Blame to human, not me.

I am not devil, but often people do abominations because of me. So I ask for justice who is the real devil.

I'm not the third person to make them divorced or make children and parents quarrel. I beg to the judge to re-examine this case.

It is very clear that I am not God. You must obey your religion forbid…

VETO VS DEMOCRACY

In this post I only quotes the things associated with the two words above. Please use your sense and read carefully to find and feel the fundamental differences from it.

VETO
According to Wikipedia: "A veto, Latin for "I FORBID" is used to denote that a certain party has the right to stop unilaterally a certain piece of legislation. In practice, the veto can be ABSOLUTE (as in the U.N. Security Council, whose permanent members can block any resolution). In the United Nations Security Council, the five permanent members (the United States, Russia, the People's Republic of China, France and the United Kingdom) have veto power in substantive matters, though NOT in procedural ones. If any of these countries votes against a proposal, it is REJECTED, even if all of the other member countries vote in FAVOUR."

According to Global Policy Forum: "The five permanent members of the Security Council (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States) ENJOY the p…

Messages from golden wedding anniversary

The wedding anniversary was historically derived from Roman empire tradition, where husbands crown his wife with a silver wreath on their twenty-fifth anniversary, and a gold wreath on the fiftieth anniversary. In the present, generally, it called silver wedding anniversary for 25th years of marriage and the golden wedding anniversary for 50th years of marriage. Many people dream of their wedding will be lasting but many of them also fail.

For those of you who dream of it, then there is a philosophical message from a modest golden wedding anniversary, a pieces of dialog between emcee and bride, as follow :

Emcee : (jokingly) "What is the most annoying thing from your husband?"
Bride : "As many as the stars in the sky, unable to count them"
Emcee : (shocked) "Well, but your husband's kindness is also abundant, right?"
Bride : "A little, like the sun in the sky"
Emcee : (curious) "Then why you could live with him for half a century and st…

What a PhD mean for you

What is Ph.D.? Yes, I know it is an academic degree. That's it. No, I think. It's hard to describe it in words. You better focus on the illustration below:





And... the things that made me fall silent is what was said by Matt:
"If you zoom in on the boundary of human knowledge in the direction of genetics, there's something just outside humanity's reach. My wife and I chose to start funding these graduate students after we learned that our son has a rare, fatal genetic disorder. It may be too late for my son, but it's not too late for other children. Even one child suffering is one child too many. The only way to end this kind of suffering is science. And, the best way to do science is through graduate students."
What a beautifull thoughts that touched my heart.
Note: This work is originaly from The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D. by Matt Might.

STOP the hatred war in the social networking site

Lately, I feel very worried by unscrupulous users of Facebook who already out of the spirit of Facebook motto namely "Facebook helps you connect and share with the people in your life". Some of Facebook users who use this site only for uploading pornographic images and shared it using private setting to certain people (not shared to everyone) and the other using it for spreading the hatred feelings, like a Facebook Group calling for Obama's death.

Although a very controversial Pages on Facebook namely "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" which it created by Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris has been closed by Facebook after receiving protests from various parties including protests from the Indonesian government, the most recent controversy is the two opposing group on Facebook who mocked each other namely: "Everybody Draw Mohammed day (Indonesian version)" and the other one is "Everybody Draw Jesus day (Indonesian version)". As I observed on its la…

Diversity is destiny

Competition between pair Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (known as Ahok) - Djarot Saiful Hidayat and Anis Baswedan - Sandiaga Uno in the Jakarta gubernatorial election has ended. Although the scale of this election is only for Jakarta, this political contestation has a wide influence in Indonesia and gained international attention.

I do not want to talk at length about the first paragraph in this post because I'm sure everyone in Indonesia already knows about the political tension behind it and how its influence to the national unity. I am only interested in conveying the philosophical message to you all in relation to that matter.

Diversity is destiny. So that's destiny if in Indonesia there are Chinese, Balinese, Javanese, Sundanese, Acehnese, Irian, etc. More globally there are white, yellow, black. We can not choose to be born as what tribe or nation. We can not choose to be born in a Muslim, Christian, or Buddhist family. We can not choose to be born in rich family. It is God'…

Capital Punishment Against Bali Bombers

Last night, when I watching TV, I be attracted with the news about capital punishment against the main performers of the Bali Bombings incident. According to "TV One" (one of the Indonesian TV broadcasting), on October 24, 2008 (means today), the Indonesian attorney general will announce the execution plan for them. Faced that announcement, their family will put forward the re-consideration through their lawyer team next week.

Yes, according to the law, they were guilty and must be punished. But the capital punishment is equivalent with splitting the soul from the body. My big question is "Whether these world must have the capital punishment?" I don't know!

Photo: The Bali bombing memorial on the site of Paddy's Pub.
Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Bali_bombings